The Screen Test activity uses Warhol’s filmed portraits as a basis for exploring character development, human expression and communication through interpretive looking, discussion as well as video creation. After viewing and discussing Warhol’s Screen Tests, students will develop their own on-screen personality and film one another, using Warhol’s “recipe.” Students will compare and contrast Warhol’s Screen Tests to Hollywood screen tests and discuss how “living portraits” can be created through the use of film.
Art, Digital Media, Film, Communications, Theatre
2 class periods
Warhol’s Screen Tests are revealing portraits of hundreds of different individuals, shot between 1963 and 1966. The subjects include both famous and anonymous visitors to Warhol’s studio, including poet Allen Ginsberg, actor Dennis Hopper and artist Salvador Dali, along with many other diverse individuals. When asked to pose, subjects were lit and filmed by Warhol’s stationary 16mm Bolex camera on silent, black and white, 100-foot rolls of film. Each Screen Test is exactly the same length, lasting only as long as the roll of film. The standard formula of subject and camera remaining almost motionless for the duration of the film results in a “living portrait.” The films, projected in slow motion, last four minutes each. Outside of Warhol’s standardized process there are subtle lighting and focus variations in the Screen Tests. Jane Holzer’s is in soft focus and suffused with light, creating an ethereal, hypnotic effect while Piero Heliczer’s is darker in mood. In addition, there are a number of Screen Tests that diverge from this format entirely, the sitter purposely moving, gesticulating or using props.
These film portraits, referred to by the Hollywood term of “screen test,” were not created for the purpose of actually testing or auditioning actors. A traditional Hollywood screen test is a method used to judge whether an actor is suitable on film, and beyond that, if they are right for a specific character. Usually he or she is given a scene, a script, and instructions to perform in front of a camera. The director then watches the test to make a determination about the actor’s appearance and film qualities. In these short films, Warhol creates his own cache of “Superstars.” Superstars are actors interesting enough to carry a film on their own—not by playing a particular role but simply by being “themselves.”
Some of the individual Screen Tests were selected for Warhol’s conceptual projects, such as Thirteen Most Beautiful Women and Thirteen Most Beautiful Boys. Some of Warhol's Screen Tests were also featured as part of the light show for his 1966-1967 multi-media happenings, the Up-tight and the Exploding Plastic Inevitable. In these shows, The Velvet Underground and Nico performed their ear-splitting, urban-style drone music, accompanied by Superstar dancers bathed in colored lights in front of large projections of slides and Warhol’s films.
“Beauties in photographs are different from beauties in person. It must be hard to be a model, because you’d want to be like the photograph of you, and you can’t ever look that way. And so you start to copy the photograph. Photographs usually bring in another half-dimension. (Movies bring in another whole dimension. That screen magnetism is something secret – if you could only figure out what it is and how to make it, you’d have a really good product to sell. But you can’t even tell if someone has it until you actually see them up there on the screen. You have to give screen tests to find out.)"
“The resulting films drastically reduced the roles of director and viewer alike. The director’s function was limited to choosing the subject, setting up the shot, turning the camera on and off and deciding whether or not to exhibit the result. And the viewer, for the first time in the history of the commercial exploitation of persistence-of-vision, was relieved of the obligation—perhaps even a large part of the desire—to pay attention to the screen. The standard ‘film-as-wallpaper’ definition of the early Warhol films doesn’t stand up, since their entire meaning and effect spring from the fact of their projection on a screen in a darkened room.”
“The many Screen Tests evidence a variety of behavior of its portrait subjects, but amazingly little improvisation. The subjects actually look like they are captured and about to be interrogated, but the interrogation never happens, because Andy wanted to capture the essence of the person only, no interference, just like no interference with the camera as it recorded each “moving” still-life. The Screen Tests rank in the Warhol pantheon along with the Campbell’s Soup cans, Marilyns, and self-portraits.”
- Filmed in black and white
- Subject sits in a chair facing the camera
- The chair is illuminated by a directed light source
- Subject is very still with as little motion as possible
- Three minutes in length
Students will create a written character sketch of three personalities captured in the class screen test.
As a group, watch the screen test tape and discuss the on-screen personalities. Based upon the footage, students determine which person would be best suited for various film roles: a villain, a best friend, a hero or a royal personage, etc. Students also critique the formal qualities of their screen tests.
Click the Warhol Rubric headers below to reveal associated rubrics to which this lesson applies.
National Visual Arts Standards
21st Century Skills Standards
Lessons from The Andy Warhol Museum have been mapped to National Visual Arts Standards, 21st Century Standards and Pennsylvania Visual Arts Standards. Click an achieved standard to read more and see other lessons. View all standards here.
© 2013 The Andy Warhol Museum | 117 Sandusky Street,
Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5890 | Phone: 412.237.8300 |
email@example.com | Legal Notice |